Archive for the 'Volume 89-3' Category



Arbitrary Death: An Empirical Study of Mitigation

The Supreme Court has long viewed mitigation evidence as key to saving the death penalty from constitutional challenge. Mitigation evidence about a capital defendant’s life history, combined with other procedural protections, is thought to alleviate arbitrariness in juries’ decisions of whether a defendant deserves to die. This Article presents original empirical research studying that hypothesis. [...]

Categories: Articles, In Print, Volume 89, Volume 89-3 | Posted: February 7, 2012