<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Washington University Law Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawreview.wustl.edu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawreview.wustl.edu</link>
	<description>The flagship student legal publication of Washington University in St. Louis School of Law</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Unwarranted Weight of a &#8220;Paper Barrier&#8221;: A Proposal to Ax the Apex Doctrine</title>
		<link>http://lawreview.wustl.edu/in-print/the-unwarranted-weight-of-a-paper-barrier-a-proposal-to-ax-the-apex-doctrine/</link>
		<comments>http://lawreview.wustl.edu/in-print/the-unwarranted-weight-of-a-paper-barrier-a-proposal-to-ax-the-apex-doctrine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Current Notes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In Print]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Volume 89]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Volume 89-6]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawreview.wustl.edu/?p=2550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[I]f Mr. Iacocca has any information, albeit inadmissible as evidence reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, he must be required to reveal the same. His prestigious position is an unimpressive paper barrier shielding him from the judicial process . . . . [But] [t]he fact remains he is a singularly unique [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawreview.wustl.edu/in-print/the-unwarranted-weight-of-a-paper-barrier-a-proposal-to-ax-the-apex-doctrine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court-Mandated Story Time: The Victim Narrative in U.S. Asylum Law</title>
		<link>http://lawreview.wustl.edu/in-print/court-mandated-story-time-the-victim-narrative-in-us-asylum-law/</link>
		<comments>http://lawreview.wustl.edu/in-print/court-mandated-story-time-the-victim-narrative-in-us-asylum-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Current Notes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In Print]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Volume 89]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Volume 89-6]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawreview.wustl.edu/?p=2547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the late 2000s and early 2010s, anti-immigrant rhetoric rose on a tide of fears about the U.S. economy.  Nativist narratives inspired by rising unemployment dominated an increasingly antagonistic debate about U.S. immigration policy.  Restrictive state laws, most notably those found in Alabama and Arizona,  and a movement to ban birthright citizenship [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawreview.wustl.edu/in-print/court-mandated-story-time-the-victim-narrative-in-us-asylum-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vol. 89:6</title>
		<link>http://lawreview.wustl.edu/in-print/896/</link>
		<comments>http://lawreview.wustl.edu/in-print/896/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 13:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[In Print]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In Print - Table of Contents]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Volume 89]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Volume 89-6]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Volumes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawreview.wustl.edu/?p=2524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawreview.wustl.edu/in-print/896/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Factions for the Rest of Us</title>
		<link>http://lawreview.wustl.edu/in-print/factions-for-the-rest-of-us/</link>
		<comments>http://lawreview.wustl.edu/in-print/factions-for-the-rest-of-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 00:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Current Article]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In Print]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Volume 89]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Volume 89-6]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawreview.wustl.edu/?p=2507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am grateful to Washington University School of Law for hosting the recent discussion on my book Liberty’s Refuge: The Forgotten Freedom of Assembly.  I had three objectives in writing Liberty’s Refuge: one diagnostic, one historical, and one normative. The diagnosis highlights difficulties with the current doctrine of intimate and expressive association.  The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawreview.wustl.edu/in-print/factions-for-the-rest-of-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liberty&#8217;s Forgotten Refugees? Engendering Assembly</title>
		<link>http://lawreview.wustl.edu/in-print/libertys-forgotten-refugees-engendering-assembly/</link>
		<comments>http://lawreview.wustl.edu/in-print/libertys-forgotten-refugees-engendering-assembly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 00:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Current Article]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In Print]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Volume 89]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Volume 89-6]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawreview.wustl.edu/?p=2505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Inazu’s impressive book, Liberty’s Refuge: The Forgotten Freedom of Assembly,  interweaves two projects. First, it critiques the Supreme Court’s development of the freedom of association. Second, it makes the case for reviving the freedom of assembly in order to strengthen constitutional protection for the rights of groups, in particular, groups’ “right to exclude.” [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawreview.wustl.edu/in-print/libertys-forgotten-refugees-engendering-assembly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Necessary is the Right of Assembly?</title>
		<link>http://lawreview.wustl.edu/in-print/how-necessary-is-the-right-of-assembly/</link>
		<comments>http://lawreview.wustl.edu/in-print/how-necessary-is-the-right-of-assembly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 00:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Current Article]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In Print]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Volume 89]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Volume 89-6]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawreview.wustl.edu/?p=2503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a political culture seemingly hard-wired for the full-throated championing of individual rights, we are not quite sure what to do with liberty claims by groups. Whether we are talking about corporate speech rights,  the treatment of religious student groups at public universities,  the limits of the ministerial exception,  the Boy Scouts’ [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawreview.wustl.edu/in-print/how-necessary-is-the-right-of-assembly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liberty&#8217;s Refuge, or the Refuge of Scoundrels?: The Limits of the Right of Assembly</title>
		<link>http://lawreview.wustl.edu/in-print/libertys-refuge-or-the-refuge-of-scoundrels-the-limits-of-the-right-of-assembly/</link>
		<comments>http://lawreview.wustl.edu/in-print/libertys-refuge-or-the-refuge-of-scoundrels-the-limits-of-the-right-of-assembly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 00:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Current Article]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In Print]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Volume 89]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Volume 89-6]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawreview.wustl.edu/?p=2501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Professor John Inazu’s recently published book, Liberty’s Refuge: The Forgotten Freedom of Assembly,  is a truly impressive achievement. It is a good book for all of the usual reasons: it is well-researched, well-written, and persuasive. But Liberty’s Refuge is more than just well done—it is an important book in the contribution it makes to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawreview.wustl.edu/in-print/libertys-refuge-or-the-refuge-of-scoundrels-the-limits-of-the-right-of-assembly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
